In several of the cities we have visited, we have witnessed locals voicing
their opinions on topics they care passionately about. This has often taken the form of individuals
sharing their personal ideals, but on a few occasions, we have witnessed large
scale protests. The smaller examples of
activism seem to mostly concern preservation of the rich Incan architecture. For example, on nearly every walk down the
streets of Cusco, you can see individuals holding signs reminding tourists not
to touch the stone walls. Although apparently
not paid to enforce this rule, it seems that the locals have so much pride in
the work of their ancestors that they spend hours a day drawing attention to
its preservation. Another example of
individual activism in Lima was a man who had a large poster attached to his
bike promoting veganism. This sign was
clearly handmade, and more than likely impeded his ability to maneuver his bike. Regardless, he was passionate enough about
promoting veganism that these inconveniences did not stop him. These examples show that many Peruvians feel
empowered enough to speak up about issues that bother them.
We have also seen people
work collectively to have their voice heard.
The first large scale protest we witnessed was in Ollantaytambo. Despite the relatively small size of the
town, the crowd that gathered to march was large enough to occupy nearly two
blocks worth of road. This group was
very well organized, carrying banners that spanned the width of the street and
shouting chants in unison. At first glance,
I admired the unity of these locals; however, on closer inspection, I realized
that the purpose of the protest was very vague.
For example, many of the signs condemned governmental corruption,
something that everyone can agree with.
In fact, I was unable to determine the specific purpose of this march until
I heard some guards at the ruins of Ollantaytambo describe the locals’ anger
over agricultural issues. Overall, the
way in which locals conducted this protest made it seem as if their real goal
was to get the government officials’ attention, rather than bring awareness to
the issue itself.
In contrast, the large
protest which occurred in Cusco had a very specific purpose. In this case, locals had bright pink and blue
signs with phrases criticizing the view of gender as a spectrum. Without even closely approaching the group
gathered on the steps of the main plaza, the colors of the signs made it clear that
this protest concerned gender. Upon
closer inspection, we discovered that this group opposed the country’s decision
to include education about the gender spectrum in schools. Although I disagreed with the opinion of
these protesters, I believe their strategy for getting their opinions heard was
quite effective. By choosing the main
square, they were able to get the attention of both the locals and tourists in
the area. This assures that their voices
would be heard by the most people, thus creating the most potential for
change. In this case, not only did
people get attention, but they also clearly conveyed the issue they were concerned
about.
One final march we witnessed
occurred in Lima. In this case, a church
group marched in a much more refined manner than either of the other large
groups we have seen. They were still
holding signs and chanting, yet they presented a much more reserved attitude. Their march ended in a square, where they planned
to conduct mass for the crowd. This type
of activism, recruiting for religion, seems to be present worldwide, with
Peruvians being no exception. In all,
the fact that people in both smaller towns and large tourist cities choose to
protest as a way to make their voice heard shows that across this region of
Peru, people feel empowered enough to stand up for what they believe.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.