As with all Maymesters, Span 3330:
Cultural Studies in the Andes requires us to take courses Monday through
Friday. Classes are typically from 10:00 am to 1:00 pm, and we engage in a
variety of different activities, ranging from delivering in-class presentations
on articles relating to Andean culture, watching and analyzing movies and
videos pertaining to our weekend trips (i.e. Machu Picchu), and holding seminar
discussions about the activities we’ve participated in thus far. While I find
the classwork and material incredibly interesting, I cannot help but notice
differences between the university in Cusco where we take our classes and
traditional universities in the United States.
First, the use of technology in the
classroom is far less in Cusco. Although we use a television in the classroom
to project our class lecture notes and material, there is no projector. At
Vanderbilt, I’ve taken courses where one classroom will have access to smart
boards, projectors, and in-room computers. Because we’re gotten the same amount
of material accomplished in our classroom in Cusco, I wonder if it’s even
necessary to have all of the technology that we do in classrooms at Vanderbilt.
In addition to this difference, the University here is Cusco is also relatively
small. There are fewer classrooms, and the building is located in a relatively
secluded location with few classrooms, in contrast to a traditional college
campus with several different buildings around one community. I also wonder
whether or not students at the University live on campus, as it seems like most
students commute from other locations here in Cusco. Finally, there is a certain
level of hospitality that exists in the University in Cusco. In each classroom,
there are glasses, tea bags, and hot water for all students and professors to
access. These give the classrooms a more “homey” feel and help students stay
focused.
After observing all of these
differences, I’ve noticed that certain aspects of Vanderbilt’s campus are not imperative
for our learning; instead, they are there to make the school more attractive
and appealing. Without the overuse of technology or traditional campus
environment, Vanderbilt could put that money towards other aspects of
schooling; however, I wonder if the school would still be as attractive to prospective
students. Furthermore, I wonder if schools in Cusco don’t necessarily have to do seemingly unnecessary things
to make the school more appealing, as there are fewer competitors.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.